Propagation of Light using ElectromagnetismReturn to Table of ContentsThin Lenses


Mirrors.

Suppose we have an object that is either self-luminous or externally illuminated, and imagine its surface as consisting of a large number of point sources. Each of these emits spherical waves. The waves diverge from a give point source O. If the spherical wave were collapsing to a point, the rays are converging. Generally, we deal only with a small portion of a wavefront. A point from which a portion of a spherical wave diverges, or one towards which the wave segment converges, is known as a focal point of the bundle of rays.

Now envision the situation in which we have a point source in the vicinity of some arrangement of reflecting and refracting surfaces representing an optical system. Of the infinity of rays emanating from O, in general only one will pass through an arbitrary point in space. Even so, it is possible to arrange for an infinite number of rays to arrive at a certain point I.

drawing

Thus, if for a cone of rays coming from O there is a corresponding cone of rays passing through I, the system is said to be stigmatic for these two points. The energy in the cone reaches I, which is then referred to as a perfect image of O. The wave could conceivable arrive to form a finite patch of light, or blur spot, about I; it would still be an image of O but no longer a perfect one.

General Images

We discuss now what is meant by an image in general and indicate the practical and theoretical factors that render an image less than perfect. The optical system may include any number of intervening media, but we shall assume that each individual medium is homogeneous and isotropic, and so characterized by its own refractive index. Thus rays spread out radially in all directions from the object point O in real object space, which precedes the first reflecting or refracting surface of the optical system. On leaving the optical system the rays enter a real image space. In the spirit of Fermat's principle, we can say that since every ray starts at O and ends at I, every such ray requires the same transit time. These rays are said to be isochronous. Further, by the principle of reversibility, if O is the object point, each ray will reverse its direction but maintain its path through the optical system, every ray from O intercepted by the system - and only these rays - also passes through I. To image an actual object, this requirement must hold for every object point and its conjugate image point.

Nonideal images are formed in practice because of

  1. light scattering,
  2. aberrations, and
  3. diffraction.
Some rays leaving O do not reach I due to reflection losses at refracting surfaces, diffuse reflections from reflecting surfaces, and scattering by inhomogeneities in transparent media. Loss of rays by such means merely diminishes the brightness of the image; however, some of these rays are scattered through P from nonconjugate object points, degrading the image. When the optical system itself cannot produce the one-to-one relationship between object and image rays required for perfect imaging of all object points, we speak of system aberrations. Finally, since every optical system intercepts only a portion of the wavefront emerging from the object, the image cannot be perfectly sharp. Even if the image were otherwise perfect, the effect of using a limited portion of the wavefront leads to diffraction and a blurred image, which is said to be diffraction limited. This source of imperfect images represents a fundamental limit to the sharpness of an image that cannot be entirely overcome. This difficulty rises from the wave nature of light. Only in the unattainable limit of geometrical optics, where formula, would diffraction effects disappear entirely.

Cartesian Surfaces

Reflecting or refracting surfaces that form perfect images are called Cartesian surfaces. In the case of reflection, such surfaces are the conic sections. Cartesian surfaces that produce perfect imaging by refraction may be more complicated. Let us ask for the equation of the appropriate refracting surface that images object point O at image point I. There is an arbitrary point P with coordinates (x,y) is on the required surface capital sigma.
drawing

The requirement that every ray from O, like OPI, refracts and passes through the image I. Another such ray is OVI, where V is normal to the surface at its vertex point V. By Fermat's principle, these are isochronous rays. Since the media on either side of the refracting surface are characterized by different refractive indices, however, the isochronous rays are not equal in length. The transit time of a ray through a medium of thickness x with refractive index n is

 formula.                                                                (8.1)

Therefore, equal times imply equal values of the product nx, called the optical path length. For this problem, Fermat's principle requires that

                   formula.                                         (8.2)

In terms of the (x,y) coordinates of P, the first term in (8.2) becomes

 formula.                             (8.3)

The constant in the equation is determined by the middle member of equation (8.2), which can be calculated once the specific problem is defined. Equation (8.3) describes the Cartesian ovoid of revolution.

In most cases, however, the image is desired in the same optical medium as the object. This goal is achieved by a lens that refracts light rays twice, once at each surface, producing a real image outside the lens. Thus it is of particular interest to determine the Cartesian surfaces that render every object ray parallel after the first refraction. Such rays incident on the second surface can then be refracted again to form an image. Depending on the relative magnitudes of the refractive indices, the appropriate refracting surface is either a hyperboloid (ni > n0) or an ellipsoid (ni > n0). It should be noted that the aberration free imaging so achieved applies only to the object point I at the correct distance from the lens and on axis. For nearby points, imaging is not perfect. The larger the actual object, the less precise is its image. Because images of actual objects are not free from aberrations and because hyperboloid surfaces are difficult to grind exactly, most optical surfaces are spherical. The spherical aberrations so introduced are accepted as a compromise when weighed against the relative ease of fabricating spherical surfaces. We will concentrate on the case of spherical reflecting and refracting surfaces with a radius of curvature R. In the limit formula, we deal with the special case of a plane surface.

Spherical Mirrors

Spherical mirrors may be either concave or convex relative to an object point O, depending on whether the center of curvature C is on the same or opposite side of the surface.
drawing

In the figure the mirror shown is convex, and two rays of light originating at O are drawn, one normal to the spherical surface at its vertex V and the other an arbitrary ray incident at P. The first ray reflects back along itself; the second reflects at P as if from a tangent plane at P, satisfying the law of reflection. The two reflected rays diverge as they leave the mirror. The intersection of the two rays (extended backward) determines the image point I conjugate to O. The image is virtual, located behind the mirror surface. Object and image distances from the vertex are shown as s and s' respectively.

Gaussian Optics

We seek a relationship between s and s' that depends only on the radius of curvature R of the mirror. By referring to the figure, we can use the fact that the exterior angle of a triangle equals the sum of its interior angles. Thus,
formula

which combine to give

 formula.                                                       (8.4)

We can write these angles in terms of the distances by approximating them as small angles. In this case we have that

formula

and

formula

so that

formula.

Returning to (8.4), we get

      formula.                                             (8.5)

Because we approximated the effect of the angles, this approximation leads to first order, or Gaussian, optics.

If the spherical surface is chosen to be concave instead, the center of curvature would be to the left. For certain positions of the object point O, it is then possible to find a real image point also to the left of the mirror. In these cases, the resulting geometric relationship consists of terms that are all positive.

It is possible, employing a sign convention, to represent all cases by the single equation

formula.

The sign convention is as follows. Assume that the light propagates from left to right. Then
 

  1. The object distance s is positive when O is to the left of V, corresponding to a real object. When O is to the right, corresponding to a virtual object, s is negative.
  2. The image distance s' is positive when I is to the left of V, corresponding to a real image, and negative when I is to the right of V, corresponding to a virtual image.
  3. The radius of curvature R is positive when C is to the right of V, corresponding to a convex mirror, and negative when C is to the left of V, corresponding to a concave mirror.
These rules can be quickly summarized by noticing that positive object and image distances corresponding to real objects and real images and that convex mirrors have positive radii of curvature.

For an object at infinity, incident rays are parallel and formula. The image distance is defined as the focal length of the mirrors. Thus,

formula (8.6)

and the mirror equation can be written, more compactly, as

formula. (8.7)

Magnification

We can determine the transverse magnification by looking at the following figure
drawing

The object is an extended object of transverse dimension h0. The image of the top of the arrow is located by two rays whose behavior on reflection is known. The ray incident at the vertex must reflect to make equal angles with the axis. The other ray is directed toward the center of curvature along the normal and so must reflect back along itself. The intersection of the two reflected rays occurs behind the mirror and locates a virtual image there. Because of the equality of the three angles shown, it follows that

formula. (8.8)

The lateral magnification is determined by the ratio of lateral image size to corresponding lateral object size, giving

formula. (8.9)

Extending the sign convention to include magnification, we assign a plus magnification to the case where the image has the same orientation as the object and a negative magnification when the image is inverted relative to the object. Applying this to the figure, in order to produce a plus magnification since s' must be negative, we must modify equation (8.9) to give a general form of

formula. (8.10)

Graphical Methods

Once the center of curvature and the focal point are located, image formation by a spherical mirror may be determined approximately by graphical methods. The following diagrams demonstrate some simple ray diagrams for spherical mirrors.
drawing
drawing
drawing

In all cases, three rays are drawn from the object to the mirror. The first ray moves horizontally from the object to the mirror. This ray will pass through the focal point, since parallel rays focus at the focal point. By a similar argument, the second ray can be drawn. This ray runs from the object to the focal point, and then reflects from the mirror along a path parallel to the central axis. Finally, the third ray is drawn from the object to the center of curvature. This is the ray which is unaffected by the mirror and continues to move in a straight line. The point at which the three rays again cross show where the image will form. If the object and mirror are drawn to scale, then the position of the object can be determined directly.

Planar and Aspherical Mirrors

In addition to spherical mirrors, two other types of mirrors should be considered: planar, or flat, mirrors, and aspherical mirrors. Both types of mirrors can be described using the machinery developed for spherical mirrors, so only the results will be stated here.

Probably the most common mirror in our everyday living is the planar mirror. The spherical mirror described by equation (8.5) yields a plane mirror with formula, s' = -s. The negative sign implies a virtual image for a real object. Similarly, the magnification is found from equation (8.10) to be equal to unity. This tells us that the resulting image is a full sized, virtual erect image. Each point of an extended object, at a perpendicular distance s from the mirror, is imaged at the same distance behind the mirror. The only obvious change is the 180degrees rotation about the optical axis, an effect known as reversion. Notice that if we image a coordinate axis, it also undergoes a revision.

drawing

The coordinate system, which was originally described by a right hand rule, now requires a left hand rule to properly orient the axes. The process which converts a right handed coordinate system into a left handed one is known as inversion, and it has important uses in other areas of physics as well.

We saw earlier that a spherical mirror will reflect a point into a perfect image only when the object and image both lie at the center of curvature of the mirror. This rarely happens in reality. With other distances, a perfect image will result only if an aspherical mirror is used. In order to understand this, consider the following drawing:

drawing

Here, the surface capital sigma represents plane waves traveling though a region with index of refraction n2, and then impinging on a Cartesian ovoid with an index of refraction n1. By Fermat's principle, in order for an arbitrary point D on the wavefront to focus at the point F1 in minimum time, the optical path lengths must all equal a constant, as stated in equation (8.2). Comparing the equation to the figure, we see that

formula

or

formula. (8.11)

From analytic geometry, the surface capital sigma can be associated with the directrix of the ellipse, so that

formula (8.12)

where e is the eccentricity. Solving (8.12) for formula and substituting into (8.11) shows that we must have

formula. (8.13)

It should be noted that even though we used an ellipse to construct this result, it applies equally well to any conic section.

Returning to mirrors, we can apply this result to see that any conic shape can be used to make a mirror. Indeed, telescopic mirrors are actually parabolic in shape, and hyperbolic and ellipsoidal elements are used in the construction of Cassegrainian and Gregorian secondaries. 


Propagation of Light using ElectromagnetismReturn to Table of ContentsThin Lenses

Last updated: July 22, 1997

Comments to: D-Suson@tamuk.edu