|
|
(3)
|
where k is a constant of proportionality. In MKS units, k is given by
This is frequently written in terms of another
constant, the permittivity constant, e0
(e0=
8.8542 x 10-12 C2/Nm2)
|
|
(4)
|
Example:
Three positive charges lie
on the x-axis; q1 = 25 mC
is at the origin, q2 = 10 mC
is at x = 2 m, and q3 = 20 mC
is a x = 3 m. Find the resultant force on q3.

The force on q3 due to q2, which is 1 m away, is in the positive x direction and has a magnitude of
The force on q3 due to q1, which is 3 m away, is also in the positive x direction. Its magnitude is
Since both forces are in the positive direction, the resultant is also in that direction and just the sum of the magnitudes:
Example:
Two electrons are located
1 m apart. What is the ratio of the magnitudes of their electrical and
gravitational forces?
The ratio of the electrical and gravitational force can be written as
Notice that this result is independent of distance.
Example:
As an example of the power
in the Maxwell equations and the Lorentz force law, we derive the Coulomb
force law. The Coulomb force law is valid in the absence of any magnetic
phenomenon, so we can set B = 0 in (2). Similarly, we will
see that we can define the electric field of a single charge as
.
Combining these results in (2), we get

But, this is just Coloumb's force law!
For now we will be considering electrostatics; that is, when all of the charges in the region are not moving and the electrical field is constant throughout time. In this case, there is no magnetic field (B = 0).
This defines the force on charge 1 by charge 2. We can rewrite this as
Thus we see that the field due to charge 2 is
given by
|
|
(5)
|
Since the force involved is electrical, this
is called the electric field.
How does this approach differ
from the traditional concept of action at a distance that we have been
using up till now? The most basic difference is that the concept of interactions
via action at a distance implies that, as one particle moves, the change
in the force acting on another particle is felt immediately (to see this,
notice the absence of a velocity factor or time dependence in all of the
above equations). But, we know from experiment that nothing can travel
than the speed of light, c. Therefore, we are forced to accept the
notion of fields. One could argue that the absence of a velocity or time
dependence in the definition of the fields yields the same problem, except
that now we have particle 2 acting instantaneously on the field. The change
in the field can occur at the speed of light (since so far, we have not
investigated the properties of the field itself), and then the change in
the force at particle 1 also occurs instantaneously. Note that the two
instantaneous changes are now allowed since the field is "in contact" with
the particle.
What we have defined above
is the electric field for a point particle. In order to generalize this
to any situation, we define the field at a point occupied by a test
charge q0 to be
|
|
(6)
|
where F is the force that acts upon the test charge by all the other charges in the region of interest. Note that this definition is a completely general one. We can apply it to gravitation as easily as electromagnetism by taking the particle's mass, m, as the test charge. In the case of a static electric field (which is all that we are considering currently), the field is the electric field and is denoted by ƒ = E. In MKS units, the electric field has units of Newtons/Coulomb (N/C).
Example:
a) When a 5 nC test
charge is placed at a point, it experiences a force of 2x10-4
N in the x-direction. What is the electric field E
at that point?
From the definition, the electric field is
where i is the unit vector in the
x direction.
b) What is the force
on an electron placed at the point where the electric field is 4x104
i N/C?
Since the charge on an electron is -e = -1.6 x 10-19 C, the force is
In most situations, we do not know the force involved. Instead, we are given a system of charges and distances between them. In order to calculate the electrical field in these situations, we must go back to the field of a point charge
Since the electrical field is a vector quantity,
whenever we have more than one charge we can find the resultant field by
adding the individual fields vectorially
|
|
(7)
|
Example:
What is the total electrical
field of a dipole at a distance r along the perpendicular bisector?

A dipole consists of two charges separated by a distance, d = 2a. The total electrical field is given by
where
and similarly for E2. Writing this in component form and adding, we get

where
|
|
|
So we have that

For large distances (r >> a) this reduces to
where j is the unit normal in the y direction. The product 2qa is defined to be the electric dipole moment and is denoted by the symbol, p.
Example:
Sketch the lines of force
for a point charge.

Example:
Sketch the lines of force
for two equal positive point charges, q, separated by a distance
a.

Example:
Sketch the lines of force
for two charges of equal magnitude and opposite signs separated by a distance
a.

or
|
|
(8)
|
Example:
An electron is projected
into a uniform electric field who strength is E = 2000 N/C with
an initial velocity of v0 = 106 m/sec perpendicular
to the field. By how much is the electron deflected after it has traveled
1 cm?
It takes the electron a time
to travel a distance of 1 cm perpendicular to the field. In this time it is deflected a distance antiparallel to the field given by
It is possible to have rotational
motion as well as linear motion in an external field. However, the rotational
motion requires the existence of at least a dipole rather than a single
charge (this is easy to see since there can be no torque on a single point).
Consider a dipole of moment p (recall that p
= 2qa) placed at an angle q0
to a field, ƒ. We know the force on each charge in the dipole is
given by F = qƒ. Therefore, by definition,
the torque of each charge about the center of the dipole is given by
|
|
(9)
|
where a is the vector pointing from one charge to the other. This torque acts to align the dipole along the direction of the field.